How fingermark location and algorithms are changing forensic document examination

Source: Pinterest

Dutch forensic scientists use mathematical modeling and fingerprint location to tell whether someone is an unwitting victim or sinister perpetrator.

Questioned documents, aka, forensic document analysis has played a vital role in the field of forensic science. While the advent of new technology spurred many criminals to switch to digitally generated documents (and gave rise to computer forensics), handwritten document analysis remains critical for cases to connect suspects to the crime scene or criminal acts by establishing authorship. 

Analysts review handwritten documents for counterfeit and fraud, as well as suspected terrorism, suicides and illegal drug manufacturing. Terrorists may revert to handwritten documents as opposed to digitally generated documents to avoid tracking. In suicide cases, analysts evaluate suicide notes to determine authenticity of authorship. Handwritten notes in drug manufacturing cases, such as a handwritten recipe to make illicit substances, connect a suspect to the creation of a substance.

While many of the methodologies used by the field have not changed for many years, recent research out of Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences expanded the ways a written document can be analyzed by looking at fingermark location.  The authors de Ronde et al. wondered if combining a mathematical modeling system with traditional analysis methods could tell the difference between someone reading or writing a document based on their fingermark location.  Though seemingly inconsequential, this difference may be crucial to verify reported case details and suspect testimony.  For example, in some cases of intimate partner homicide, a perpetrator will forge a suicide note to gain their partner’s assets.  By analyzing their fingermark location, the program could verify if the perpetrator truly read (or actually wrote) the suicide note.

Figure 1: Example of a latent print developed with ninhydrin. Source Wikipedia.

Researchers took advantage of an already constructed mathematical program and applied it to fingermark examination on documents.  A mathematical model, named Lexie in this case, is the conversion of natural phenomena like fingerprints into a numerical representation via coding.  One hundred and twenty four participants read a printed letter and copied a prepared letter.  The scientists then made their latent or invisible prints purple with ninhydrin (Fig. 1), scanned the front and back sides, and uploaded the documents to Lexie. 

The mathematical program Lexie overlays a grid document and designating the boxes with fingermarks with 1 and empty boxes with 0 (Fig. 2).  Additional computer packages were used for the implementation of the analyses that calculated similarity and distance measurements between grids that the classification model was based on.  Heat maps, colored graphical representations, were created using the fingermark distribution for all grids in a particular scenario.  Darker areas on a heat map show larger quantities of fingermarks and lighter areas show smaller quantities.

Figure 2: The authors de Ronde et al. collected samples of fingerprints from writing and reading activities, then sprayed with ninhydrin to make the latent fingermarks visible. They uploaded the documents, applied a grid interface to localize the location of the fingermarks, and consolidated both front and back of the document. Source: de Ronde et al./ Forensic Science International 315 (2020).

The researchers noticed distinct fingerprint patterns using this model between reading and writing activities.  For reading, the fingermarks were centralized to the middle edge of both sides of letter for both the front and back.  For writing, the pattern differed based on the length of the text for right-handed individuals.  The fingermark placement for regular sized statements [ie. ½ page] was concentrated within the top half of page, whereas fingermark were widely distributed about the front page with full-length statements (Fig. 3).

Figure 3: The first image is a heat map and shows the location of fingermarks on read letters containing a full-length statement. The second image is a heat and shows the location of fingermarks on written letters containing a full-length statement. Adapted with permission from de Ronde et al./Forensic Science International 315 (2020).

Combining this knowledge with a training set for the program to “practice” on, the authors taught the model how to analyze the fingermarks and then gave it the “real” samples to test out how their program did on new information.  The classification model successfully matched 98% of the right-handed individuals (righties) and 100% of the left-handed individuals (lefties) fingermarks to their reading or writing activity.  Interestingly, there was no difference in the fingermark placement between the lefties and righties for reading, but significant difference for writing.  The righties’ fingermarks scattered the top and left sides of the paper, while the lefties’ prints dotted the entire front page.

Unfortunately, when analyzing texts written on smaller than average paper (i.e. about half the size of A4 paper), the accuracy of the matching activity dropped to below 65%.  The program could still identify read letters, just not written ones. The authors de Ronde et al. hypothesized that folding the page interfered with their analysis, as this action caused fingermarks to be placed on the back side (Fig. 4).  By considering only the front side of the letters, their accuracy jumped to 75.6%, but the program still incorrectly matched 11 written letters to a reading activity.  Even re-training the model with a practice set that included the smaller paper only improved the accuracy by 3%.

Figure 4: The first image is a heat map and shows the location of fingermarks on read letters on A5 size paper. The second image is a heat map and shows the location of fingermarks on written letters on A5 size paper. A darker area indicates more fingermarks. Adapted with permission from de Ronde et al./ Forensic Science International 315 (2020).

The scientists concluded that the classification model accurately distinguished between reading and writing based on fingermark location, regardless of handedness or text length.  In the case of the non-standard page size, researchers found that even after calibration, their accuracy remained below 80%.  However, the overall accuracy of the mathematical model demonstrated that fingermark location provides insight into the type of activity performed.  While their results warrant further tweaking, this new method could reveal if that person truly received a ransom note or was the actual author.

TitleA study into evaluating the location of fingermarks on letters given activity level propositions
AuthorsAnouk de Ronde, Marja van Aken, Christianne J. de Poot, Marcel de Puit
JournalForensic Science International
PublisherElsevier B.V.
Year2020
Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110443

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.